<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SGI to ship Altix with M$oft CCS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2007/01/11/sgi-to-ship-altix-with-moft-ccs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2007/01/11/sgi-to-ship-altix-with-moft-ccs/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Hat &#187; Is CCS really all that?</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2007/01/11/sgi-to-ship-altix-with-moft-ccs/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Hat &#187; Is CCS really all that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2007/01/11/sgi-to-ship-altix-with-moft-ccs/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] There has been a constant background hype around Microsoft’s Compute Cluster Server 2003 since SC’06, and yesterday’s announcement from SGI got me to thinking about the Microsoft strategy again. I am all for trying whatever it takes to get more people using HPC. And anything new takes a while to adopt. All good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There has been a constant background hype around Microsoft’s Compute Cluster Server 2003 since SC’06, and yesterday’s announcement from SGI got me to thinking about the Microsoft strategy again. I am all for trying whatever it takes to get more people using HPC. And anything new takes a while to adopt. All good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
