<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New technology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2007/06/26/new-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2007/06/26/new-technology/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John West</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2007/06/26/new-technology/#comment-3020</link>
		<dc:creator>John West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2007/06/26/new-technology/#comment-3020</guid>
		<description>Lorin Hochstein sent me this note by email, which I found handy and confirms what I&#039;ve seen on the blogs since the announcement was made. (Thanks, Lorin!)

&lt;blockquote&gt;
I know a little bit about the technology you mentioned in this blog entry, since I completed my PhD at Maryland just last year and had some interactions with Uzi Vishkin while I was there.

Uzi is a big proponent of the PRAM parallel programming model. He has been working for years on a parallel hardware architecture that can efficiently run programs written using a PRAM-like programming model, he calls his architecture XMT (&quot;explicit multi-threading&quot;). His group has also developed a compiler for a language they call XMT-C which is basically C with some simple extensions to support PRAM.

I&#039;m not an HPC expert (I&#039;m a software engineering person who studies HPC people), but my understanding is that everybody agrees PRAM is a much easier parallel programming model than existing models (e.g. message-passing, multithreaded), but it has never been feasible to build a system that supports a PRAM programming model and still achieves decent performance.

From the press release, it sounds like he has a working prototype of such a system now.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorin Hochstein sent me this note by email, which I found handy and confirms what I&#8217;ve seen on the blogs since the announcement was made. (Thanks, Lorin!)</p>
<blockquote><p>
I know a little bit about the technology you mentioned in this blog entry, since I completed my PhD at Maryland just last year and had some interactions with Uzi Vishkin while I was there.</p>
<p>Uzi is a big proponent of the PRAM parallel programming model. He has been working for years on a parallel hardware architecture that can efficiently run programs written using a PRAM-like programming model, he calls his architecture XMT (&#8220;explicit multi-threading&#8221;). His group has also developed a compiler for a language they call XMT-C which is basically C with some simple extensions to support PRAM.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an HPC expert (I&#8217;m a software engineering person who studies HPC people), but my understanding is that everybody agrees PRAM is a much easier parallel programming model than existing models (e.g. message-passing, multithreaded), but it has never been feasible to build a system that supports a PRAM programming model and still achieves decent performance.</p>
<p>From the press release, it sounds like he has a working prototype of such a system now.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
