Comments on: Intel set to release revved quad-core in August http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/ HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals | insideHPC Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Weekly Takeout for July 7 | insideHPC http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3369 Weekly Takeout for July 7 | insideHPC Sun, 08 Jul 2007 03:44:28 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3369 [...] Intel set to release revved quad-core in August [...] [...] Intel set to release revved quad-core in August [...]

]]> By: John West http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3264 John West Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:50:40 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3264 So I've done a little more reading on this, and from what I can tell FBDIMMs add about 6 watts of power consumption per DIMM over non-FB counterparts. That may make them closer, but I don't think that will get you all the way to the 35W difference. What am I missing? So I’ve done a little more reading on this, and from what I can tell FBDIMMs add about 6 watts of power consumption per DIMM over non-FB counterparts. That may make them closer, but I don’t think that will get you all the way to the 35W difference.

What am I missing?

]]> By: John http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3198 John Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:25:26 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3198 Excellent point; we should certainly focus more on total system consumption given the systems we build. Thanks! Excellent point; we should certainly focus more on total system consumption given the systems we build. Thanks!

]]> By: me http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3192 me Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:27:06 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3192 add it in the power differential of FBDIMM vs DDR 2, and the total system power consumption for Intel vs AMD still tips in favor of AMD. add it in the power differential of FBDIMM vs DDR 2, and the total system power consumption for Intel vs AMD still tips in favor of AMD.

]]> By: me http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3191 me Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:26:15 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/2007/07/02/intel-set-to-release-revved-quad-core-in-august/#comment-3191 50W for Intel vs 85W AMD. Okay that's fine. FBDIMM vs DDR 2 power difference still puts AMD way under for total system power consumption when a total system is compared from the two vendors. 50W for Intel vs 85W AMD. Okay that’s fine. FBDIMM vs DDR 2 power difference still puts AMD way under for total system power consumption when a total system is compared from the two vendors.

]]>