<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google patents computing in a trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2007/10/10/google-patents-computing-in-a-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2007/10/10/google-patents-computing-in-a-trailer/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hypo</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2007/10/10/google-patents-computing-in-a-trailer/#comment-13514</link>
		<dc:creator>hypo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2007/10/10/google-patents-computing-in-a-trailer/#comment-13514</guid>
		<description>Perhaps one day the Supreme Court will take a case and strike down a ruling for the plaintiff suing a defendant under a patent infringement lawsuit with the explanation that you cannot patent an obvious solution to a problem that can reasonably be solved with basic common sense.

Maybe they already have.

What is so special about prefabricating a data center in a shipping container or other mobile container?

Save patent protection for something that really required some original thinking.

If Google did some original engineering work on packaging, cooling or maybe a special shockproof transportation method, now that would justify a patent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps one day the Supreme Court will take a case and strike down a ruling for the plaintiff suing a defendant under a patent infringement lawsuit with the explanation that you cannot patent an obvious solution to a problem that can reasonably be solved with basic common sense.</p>
<p>Maybe they already have.</p>
<p>What is so special about prefabricating a data center in a shipping container or other mobile container?</p>
<p>Save patent protection for something that really required some original thinking.</p>
<p>If Google did some original engineering work on packaging, cooling or maybe a special shockproof transportation method, now that would justify a patent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
