<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenSolaris and NUMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/03/28/opensolaris-and-numa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/03/28/opensolaris-and-numa/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/03/28/opensolaris-and-numa/#comment-44944</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/03/28/opensolaris-and-numa/#comment-44944</guid>
		<description>Solaris has had NUMA extensions officially since the first release of Solaris 9 in 2002.  Unoffically, Solaris has had NUMA extensions since the internal &quot;Wildfire&quot; project of the late 1990s, which ran a modified Solaris 2.6 kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solaris has had NUMA extensions officially since the first release of Solaris 9 in 2002.  Unoffically, Solaris has had NUMA extensions since the internal &#8220;Wildfire&#8221; project of the late 1990s, which ran a modified Solaris 2.6 kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
