<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HPC considered harmful&#8230;? [CORRECTED][UPDATED]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HPCer</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-63358</link>
		<dc:creator>HPCer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-63358</guid>
		<description>Why would you need a debugger for the Top500 benchmark?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you need a debugger for the Top500 benchmark?  <img src='http://insidehpc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62208</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62208</guid>
		<description>I thoroughly enjoyed reading Greg&#039;s paper, and will be sending the link to a number of people.  I had to fight tooth and nail to get my place of work to purchase a debugger a while back, and now we&#039;re fighting over compiler licenses, too.  There&#039;s a sense amongst people new to the field that high performance computing is merely throwing hardware at a problem, and hoping things work.  The notion of setting aside a mere 2-3% of the hardware funds for software is considered heresy, despite the enormous returns on investment in the hardware one receives from doing so!

.... And I haven&#039;t even started ranting yet on the code development process, validating results, training, optimization, etc.  :-)

Anyways, thanks to Greg for writing this, and to John for posting it, and to HPCwire / Tabor for the free registration for the year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thoroughly enjoyed reading Greg&#8217;s paper, and will be sending the link to a number of people.  I had to fight tooth and nail to get my place of work to purchase a debugger a while back, and now we&#8217;re fighting over compiler licenses, too.  There&#8217;s a sense amongst people new to the field that high performance computing is merely throwing hardware at a problem, and hoping things work.  The notion of setting aside a mere 2-3% of the hardware funds for software is considered heresy, despite the enormous returns on investment in the hardware one receives from doing so!</p>
<p>&#8230;. And I haven&#8217;t even started ranting yet on the code development process, validating results, training, optimization, etc.  <img src='http://insidehpc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyways, thanks to Greg for writing this, and to John for posting it, and to HPCwire / Tabor for the free registration for the year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Wilson</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62188</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62188</guid>
		<description>If the article does become truly free, I&#039;d be interested in reading it as well (for obvious reasons :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the article does become truly free, I&#8217;d be interested in reading it as well (for obvious reasons <img src='http://insidehpc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Horizons subscriptions to our readers &#124; insideHPC</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62177</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Horizons subscriptions to our readers &#124; insideHPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62177</guid>
		<description>[...] HPC considered harmful&#8230;?&#160;[CORRECTED] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HPC considered harmful&#8230;?&nbsp;[CORRECTED] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John West</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62141</link>
		<dc:creator>John West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62141</guid>
		<description>Mike - as we&#039;ve talked about by email, I&#039;m working with the Horizons guys to figure out if joining really isn&#039;t free, or if the site is having issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; as we&#8217;ve talked about by email, I&#8217;m working with the Horizons guys to figure out if joining really isn&#8217;t free, or if the site is having issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Heinz</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62118</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Heinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62118</guid>
		<description>Signing up might be free, but trying to read your article seems to be a pay-only proposition.

Kind of a bait-and-switch, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signing up might be free, but trying to read your article seems to be a pay-only proposition.</p>
<p>Kind of a bait-and-switch, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Adams</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62099</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/2008/06/05/hpc-considered-harmful/#comment-62099</guid>
		<description>One of my professors at MSU, Dr. Timothy Swafford, always said that the worst answer is the answer you get that looks correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my professors at MSU, Dr. Timothy Swafford, always said that the worst answer is the answer you get that looks correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
