<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9th Russian Top50 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/09/30/9th-russian-top50-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/09/30/9th-russian-top50-released/</link>
	<description>HPC news for supercomputing professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asian Top500 &#124; insideHPC</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/09/30/9th-russian-top50-released/comment-page-1/#comment-151110</link>
		<dc:creator>Asian Top500 &#124; insideHPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=2437#comment-151110</guid>
		<description>[...] Top500 list started it all, and then came the Russian Top50. Now there is an Asian Top500. Why the new list? ince 1993, www.TOP500.org has taken the initiative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top500 list started it all, and then came the Russian Top50. Now there is an Asian Top500. Why the new list? ince 1993, <a href="http://www.TOP500.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.TOP500.org</a> has taken the initiative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexey V. Medvedev</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/09/30/9th-russian-top50-released/comment-page-1/#comment-120870</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexey V. Medvedev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=2437#comment-120870</guid>
		<description>You are right, #5 in the list is about 15 TFlops. And systems at the bottom half of the list (#25-#50) aren&#039;t more productive than 3 TFlops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, #5 in the list is about 15 TFlops. And systems at the bottom half of the list (#25-#50) aren&#8217;t more productive than 3 TFlops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

