<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Hat announces new HPC distro, earlier than expected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/10/02/red-hat-announces-new-hpc-distro-earlier-than-expected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/10/02/red-hat-announces-new-hpc-distro-earlier-than-expected/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some analysis on the Red Hat announcement &#124; insideHPC</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/10/02/red-hat-announces-new-hpc-distro-earlier-than-expected/#comment-102150</link>
		<dc:creator>Some analysis on the Red Hat announcement &#124; insideHPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=2476#comment-102150</guid>
		<description>[...] Red Hat announces new HPC distro, earlier than expected [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Red Hat announces new HPC distro, earlier than expected [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/10/02/red-hat-announces-new-hpc-distro-earlier-than-expected/#comment-100889</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=2476#comment-100889</guid>
		<description>$249 a node? That&#039;s far too much. We&#039;ve been thinking of kicking RedHat to the curb and using another distribution over the $50 per node charge we pay now. No way we&#039;ll get another $200 per node approved, in our case, that&#039;d be well over half a million dollars increase. Its much cheaper just to higher developers to roll our own tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$249 a node? That&#8217;s far too much. We&#8217;ve been thinking of kicking RedHat to the curb and using another distribution over the $50 per node charge we pay now. No way we&#8217;ll get another $200 per node approved, in our case, that&#8217;d be well over half a million dollars increase. Its much cheaper just to higher developers to roll our own tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
