<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORNL&#8217;s Jaguar Shatters Petaflop Barrier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2008/11/10/ornls-jaguar-shatters-petaflop-barrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/11/10/ornls-jaguar-shatters-petaflop-barrier/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalability.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Now we are talking peta-flops &#8230; baby!</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/11/10/ornls-jaguar-shatters-petaflop-barrier/#comment-115701</link>
		<dc:creator>scalability.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Now we are talking peta-flops &#8230; baby!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=2895#comment-115701</guid>
		<description>[...] A petaflop here, a petaflop there, and soon we are talking about real performance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A petaflop here, a petaflop there, and soon we are talking about real performance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2008/11/10/ornls-jaguar-shatters-petaflop-barrier/#comment-115678</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=2895#comment-115678</guid>
		<description>Uh...that&#039;s not actually what that release says.  It says they ran &quot;an unprecedented superconductivity calculation that achieved a sustained performance of more than 1.3 petaflops.&quot;  

Now, that&#039;s very cool.  The app scales to that size, runs across both systems, gets great performance.  But is it double or single precision?  And what about the Linpack performance? 

The 1.6PF peak here, and the 1.3PF peak of Roadrunner are double precision.  I&#039;m very curious to see next week&#039;s Top500 to see what the apples to apples (as much as possible) comparison is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230;that&#8217;s not actually what that release says.  It says they ran &#8220;an unprecedented superconductivity calculation that achieved a sustained performance of more than 1.3 petaflops.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Now, that&#8217;s very cool.  The app scales to that size, runs across both systems, gets great performance.  But is it double or single precision?  And what about the Linpack performance? </p>
<p>The 1.6PF peak here, and the 1.3PF peak of Roadrunner are double precision.  I&#8217;m very curious to see next week&#8217;s Top500 to see what the apples to apples (as much as possible) comparison is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
