http://insidehpc.com/2009/02/03/fast-forward-to-2012-ibm-breaks-20pf/ HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals | insideHPC Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 http://insidehpc.com/2009/02/03/fast-forward-to-2012-ibm-breaks-20pf/#comment-154409 Hot Topics from the World Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:20:51 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/?p=3645#comment-154409 [...] Fast Forward to 2012: IBM Breaks 20PF (insidehpc.com) [...] [...] Fast Forward to 2012: IBM Breaks 20PF (insidehpc.com) [...]

]]> http://insidehpc.com/2009/02/03/fast-forward-to-2012-ibm-breaks-20pf/#comment-152567 Next Big Future: AI Milestone: Supercomputer Given 6/7 Stone Handicap Able To Win Professional 19X19 Go Games « K21st - Essential 21st Century Knowledge Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:33:11 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/?p=3645#comment-152567 [...] Fast Forward to 2012: IBM Breaks 20PF (insidehpc.com) [...] [...] Fast Forward to 2012: IBM Breaks 20PF (insidehpc.com) [...]

]]> http://insidehpc.com/2009/02/03/fast-forward-to-2012-ibm-breaks-20pf/#comment-144722 Marty Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:40:19 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/?p=3645#comment-144722 Yes, it appears to be a typo: http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=213000489 Yes, it appears to be a typo:
http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=213000489

]]> http://insidehpc.com/2009/02/03/fast-forward-to-2012-ibm-breaks-20pf/#comment-144705 Brian Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:29:17 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/?p=3645#comment-144705 The 1.6TB must be a typo in the original article - surely they mean 1.6PB, right? That would be 1GB/core, as opposed to 1MB/core. The 1.6TB must be a typo in the original article – surely they mean 1.6PB, right? That would be 1GB/core, as opposed to 1MB/core.

]]>