<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SiCortex says Nehalem is too little, too late</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/03/30/sicortex-says-nehalem-is-too-little-too-late/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/03/30/sicortex-says-nehalem-is-too-little-too-late/</link>
	<description>HPC news for supercomputing professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiCortex revises green performance index, intros tool &#124; insideHPC</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/03/30/sicortex-says-nehalem-is-too-little-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-162406</link>
		<dc:creator>SiCortex revises green performance index, intros tool &#124; insideHPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=4188#comment-162406</guid>
		<description>[...] solution has become part of their core value proposition, and it’s not too surprising given their recent comments on the Nehalem announcement that they’d take this opportunity to differentiate themselves from Chipzilla’s pride and joy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] solution has become part of their core value proposition, and it’s not too surprising given their recent comments on the Nehalem announcement that they’d take this opportunity to differentiate themselves from Chipzilla’s pride and joy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

