<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun launches new HPC products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/04/14/sun-launches-new-hpc-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/04/14/sun-launches-new-hpc-products/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalability.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I think the fat lady has begun to sing &#8230; IBM rejected Sun&#8217;s overatures to restart discussions</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/04/14/sun-launches-new-hpc-products/#comment-162136</link>
		<dc:creator>scalability.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I think the fat lady has begun to sing &#8230; IBM rejected Sun&#8217;s overatures to restart discussions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=4432#comment-162136</guid>
		<description>[...] course, as John West pointed out   Interesting stuff, with a lot of focus on the high end, but despite the DoD Mod Program???s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, as John West pointed out   Interesting stuff, with a lot of focus on the high end, but despite the DoD Mod Program???s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John West</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/04/14/sun-launches-new-hpc-products/#comment-161954</link>
		<dc:creator>John West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=4432#comment-161954</guid>
		<description>@Boris - not in Nehalems, that was the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Boris &#8211; not in Nehalems, that was the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/04/14/sun-launches-new-hpc-products/#comment-161926</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=4432#comment-161926</guid>
		<description>&quot;As both HPCwire and The Register point out, the 6275 is pretty innovative, cramming two nodes onto a single blade.&quot;

Thats innovative? Vendors have been doing this for years on a supermicro based platform, as an example SGI&#039;s XE300 series do this. We have hardware 2 years old in that configuration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As both HPCwire and The Register point out, the 6275 is pretty innovative, cramming two nodes onto a single blade.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thats innovative? Vendors have been doing this for years on a supermicro based platform, as an example SGI&#8217;s XE300 series do this. We have hardware 2 years old in that configuration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
