<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Istanbul better price performance than Nehalem on HPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/06/29/istanbul-better-price-performance-than-nehalem-on-hpl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/06/29/istanbul-better-price-performance-than-nehalem-on-hpl/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.K.</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/06/29/istanbul-better-price-performance-than-nehalem-on-hpl/#comment-191107</link>
		<dc:creator>T.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=5849#comment-191107</guid>
		<description>@skyreadervue

99 / 12 = 8.25 not 6.6
The difference is not that big especially that Xeon rack has optimum number of cores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@skyreadervue</p>
<p>99 / 12 = 8.25 not 6.6<br />
The difference is not that big especially that Xeon rack has optimum number of cores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esmaeil Habibzadeh</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/06/29/istanbul-better-price-performance-than-nehalem-on-hpl/#comment-187232</link>
		<dc:creator>Esmaeil Habibzadeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 05:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=5849#comment-187232</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot  for the benchmark results. Regarding the peak performance calculation of AMD processor, it&#039;s been assumed to be a 4-way superscalar; could you give me some references about it? I thought of AMD processors with K10 architecture to be 3-way superscalar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot  for the benchmark results. Regarding the peak performance calculation of AMD processor, it&#8217;s been assumed to be a 4-way superscalar; could you give me some references about it? I thought of AMD processors with K10 architecture to be 3-way superscalar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyreadervue</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/06/29/istanbul-better-price-performance-than-nehalem-on-hpl/#comment-172298</link>
		<dc:creator>skyreadervue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=5849#comment-172298</guid>
		<description>But single performance ?? 74:8=9,2 for nehalem, 99:12=6,6 only for istanbul ... goodbye for nastran jobs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But single performance ?? 74:8=9,2 for nehalem, 99:12=6,6 only for istanbul &#8230; goodbye for nastran jobs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instanbul and Nehalem repeat death match in the STREAM arena &#124; insideHPC</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/06/29/istanbul-better-price-performance-than-nehalem-on-hpl/#comment-171447</link>
		<dc:creator>Instanbul and Nehalem repeat death match in the STREAM arena &#124; insideHPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=5849#comment-171447</guid>
		<description>[...] Istanbul better price performance than Nehalem on HPL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Istanbul better price performance than Nehalem on HPL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
