<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: SGI breaks off NSF petaflops deal with Pittsburgh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/14/rumor-sgi-terminates-pflops-deal-psc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/14/rumor-sgi-terminates-pflops-deal-psc/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSC has an early access SGI UV &#124; insideHPC.com</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/14/rumor-sgi-terminates-pflops-deal-psc/#comment-218118</link>
		<dc:creator>PSC has an early access SGI UV &#124; insideHPC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6169#comment-218118</guid>
		<description>[...] PSC and SGI had a public spat after Mark Barrenechea and his band of merry men took over SGI and walked away from a deal that PSC had been working with them as part of a petascale NSF bid. This put PSC in a nasty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PSC and SGI had a public spat after Mark Barrenechea and his band of merry men took over SGI and walked away from a deal that PSC had been working with them as part of a petascale NSF bid. This put PSC in a nasty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SGI and PSC: The Eadline Perspective &#124; insideHPC.com</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/14/rumor-sgi-terminates-pflops-deal-psc/#comment-173449</link>
		<dc:creator>SGI and PSC: The Eadline Perspective &#124; insideHPC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6169#comment-173449</guid>
		<description>[...] Rumor: SGI breaks off NSF petaflops deal with Pittsburgh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rumor: SGI breaks off NSF petaflops deal with Pittsburgh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The business side of HPC &#171; scalability.org</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/14/rumor-sgi-terminates-pflops-deal-psc/#comment-173106</link>
		<dc:creator>The business side of HPC &#171; scalability.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6169#comment-173106</guid>
		<description>[...] West at InsideHPC has, as usual, an interesting article on rumors of SGI abandoning a bid because of &#8220;margin games.&#8221;  The new CEO also issued a hard-line stance against doing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] West at InsideHPC has, as usual, an interesting article on rumors of SGI abandoning a bid because of &#8220;margin games.&#8221;  The new CEO also issued a hard-line stance against doing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/14/rumor-sgi-terminates-pflops-deal-psc/#comment-173092</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6169#comment-173092</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s too bad... I was really looking forward to seeing this system.  From everything I had heard, it was a really interesting design.  And while one can argue about publicity from such a win being worth a &#039;margin-based&#039; sale, it IS refreshing to see a CEO actually try to make money.  I&#039;m just sad for the science that could&#039;ve been done and all the hard work the PSC guys put in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s too bad&#8230; I was really looking forward to seeing this system.  From everything I had heard, it was a really interesting design.  And while one can argue about publicity from such a win being worth a &#8216;margin-based&#8217; sale, it IS refreshing to see a CEO actually try to make money.  I&#8217;m just sad for the science that could&#8217;ve been done and all the hard work the PSC guys put in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
