<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SGI affirms commitment to Itanium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/27/sgi-affirms-commitment-to-itanium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/27/sgi-affirms-commitment-to-itanium/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/27/sgi-affirms-commitment-to-itanium/#comment-176313</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6447#comment-176313</guid>
		<description>What else is he going to say?  
 * Saying nothing just lets the rumors continue which will hurt sales.  
 * Saying anything short of 100% support will be interpreted as confirming the rumors, and will dry up any sales remaining in the pipeline.

Therefore, by definition, they&#039;re publicly 100% committed to this product.  (And all their products).

Not meant to be critical of SGI.  No company, especially in high tech, would say anything different than this when asked about a current product.

Its a lot like when in response to rumors, the owner of a struggling baseball team issues a statement that he&#039;s &quot;100% behind the manager&quot;.  Often followed by the manager being fired within a matter of weeks, if not days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What else is he going to say?<br />
 * Saying nothing just lets the rumors continue which will hurt sales.<br />
 * Saying anything short of 100% support will be interpreted as confirming the rumors, and will dry up any sales remaining in the pipeline.</p>
<p>Therefore, by definition, they&#8217;re publicly 100% committed to this product.  (And all their products).</p>
<p>Not meant to be critical of SGI.  No company, especially in high tech, would say anything different than this when asked about a current product.</p>
<p>Its a lot like when in response to rumors, the owner of a struggling baseball team issues a statement that he&#8217;s &#8220;100% behind the manager&#8221;.  Often followed by the manager being fired within a matter of weeks, if not days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer Simpson</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/27/sgi-affirms-commitment-to-itanium/#comment-176089</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6447#comment-176089</guid>
		<description>&quot;SGI is 100% committed to Itanium.&quot;

That&#039;s at least 90% more committed than Intel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;SGI is 100% committed to Itanium.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s at least 90% more committed than Intel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Ultraviolet and the future of Itanium Altix &#124; SiliconBunny</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/27/sgi-affirms-commitment-to-itanium/#comment-176021</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Ultraviolet and the future of Itanium Altix &#124; SiliconBunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6447#comment-176021</guid>
		<description>[...] and InsideHPC (who know their stuff and are well worth a read) seem to think so. Even the eternally inaccurate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and InsideHPC (who know their stuff and are well worth a read) seem to think so. Even the eternally inaccurate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonyme</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/27/sgi-affirms-commitment-to-itanium/#comment-175967</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonyme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6447#comment-175967</guid>
		<description>Article суперская easy! Brattsy, consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article суперская easy! Brattsy, consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
