<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next iteration of MPI standard set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/30/mpi-standard-22-accepted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/30/mpi-standard-22-accepted/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Performance Computing Networking</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/30/mpi-standard-22-accepted/#comment-176800</link>
		<dc:creator>High Performance Computing Networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6501#comment-176800</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MPI&#045;2.2 is darn near done...&lt;/strong&gt;

Torsten beat me to the punch last week (and insideHPC commented on it), but I&#039;m still going write my $0.02 about the MPI&#045;2.2 spec anyway. At last week&#039;s MPI Forum meeting in Chicago (hosted at the beautiful Microsoft facility &#045;&#045; got...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MPI&#45;2.2 is darn near done&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Torsten beat me to the punch last week (and insideHPC commented on it), but I&#39;m still going write my $0.02 about the MPI&#45;2.2 spec anyway. At last week&#39;s MPI Forum meeting in Chicago (hosted at the beautiful Microsoft facility &#45;&#45; got&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Squyres</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/07/30/mpi-standard-22-accepted/#comment-176516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=6501#comment-176516</guid>
		<description>Yay deprecating the C++ bindings!  I created them, so I felt uniquely empowered to deprecate them (see all the gory details here: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/150

Next comes removing the C++ bindings in MPI-3... (https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/156)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay deprecating the C++ bindings!  I created them, so I felt uniquely empowered to deprecate them (see all the gory details here: <a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/150" rel="nofollow">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/150</a></p>
<p>Next comes removing the C++ bindings in MPI-3&#8230; (<a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/156" rel="nofollow">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/156</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
