Comments on: The odd case of the SiCortex asset sale

By: Sicortex: two mysteries. « US Patent Appl. 12213303: Comentarios.

Sicortex: two mysteries. « US Patent Appl. 12213303: Comentarios. — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:40:39 +0000

[...] Scale Compiler Suit. Some news about this in 2009 at: http://www.wbjournal.com/news43822.html and http://insidehpc.com/2009/08/07/no-results-sicortex-asset-sale/ and http://www.wbjournal.com/news44363.html and from Cray page, [...]

By: SiCortex IP still on the shelf | insideHPC.com

SiCortex IP still on the shelf | insideHPC.com — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:18:04 +0000

[...] been trying to keep tabs on SiCortex’s assets since the company shuttered during the summer. The sale was to have been [...]

By: Chris Samuel

Chris Samuel — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:40:37 +0000

There are still Open64, CLang+LLVM and PCC around as open source compilers (though LLVM depends on GCC derived parts for Fortran support, and PCC says that “Hello World” works in Fortran).

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:44:46 +0000

And here I was hoping for a legitimate open-source competitor to GCC… I guess Intel and Portland Group can exploit the anxiety of existing PathScale customers by offering competitive upgrades, etc.

By: Ed

Ed — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:22:09 +0000

Thanks John, for keeping up with this story. As holders of PathScale licenses that have an expiration date, we too would like to know what is going on with PathScale. If there is to be any value left in that company, the party that thinks they are holding on to a valuable asset had better get off the dime. Then again, maybe it’s being controlled by a competitor who wants to bury the product and doesn’t want anyone to know who they are for fear of the ill will that move would surely foster.