<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mellanox Releases 40 Gigabit Converged Network Adapter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/09/21/mellanox-releases-40-gigabit-converged-network-adapter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/09/21/mellanox-releases-40-gigabit-converged-network-adapter/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest gigabit network news &#8211; GigaBit network is slow &#8211; Spiceworks Community &#124; Ann Arbor Computer</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/09/21/mellanox-releases-40-gigabit-converged-network-adapter/#comment-191137</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest gigabit network news &#8211; GigaBit network is slow &#8211; Spiceworks Community &#124; Ann Arbor Computer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=7174#comment-191137</guid>
		<description>[...] Mellanox Releases 40 Gigabit Converged Network Adapter &#124; insideHPC.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mellanox Releases 40 Gigabit Converged Network Adapter | insideHPC.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Leidel</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/09/21/mellanox-releases-40-gigabit-converged-network-adapter/#comment-183950</link>
		<dc:creator>John Leidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=7174#comment-183950</guid>
		<description>Patrick, you are indeed correct.  In a previous life, I did quite a bit of testing with 10GbE when it was in a similar state.  Even after garnering a machine with a bus capable of supporting the full bandwidth, we could only see ~96% of the performance [which at the time was wicked cool].  I think Mellanox has actually done the right thing by releasing early.  Allow the community [especially OFED] to digest the new cards and work out any driver issues.  Once the standards come up to speed, they&#039;ll be out of the gate running hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, you are indeed correct.  In a previous life, I did quite a bit of testing with 10GbE when it was in a similar state.  Even after garnering a machine with a bus capable of supporting the full bandwidth, we could only see ~96% of the performance [which at the time was wicked cool].  I think Mellanox has actually done the right thing by releasing early.  Allow the community [especially OFED] to digest the new cards and work out any driver issues.  Once the standards come up to speed, they&#8217;ll be out of the gate running hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/09/21/mellanox-releases-40-gigabit-converged-network-adapter/#comment-183796</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=7174#comment-183796</guid>
		<description>Beyond the fact that the 40 Gb/s Ethernet spec is not finished yet (scheduled for June 2010), how do you run 40 Gb/s through a PCIe Gen2 x8 slot ? That&#039;s 32 Gb/s theoretical bandwidth, 26 Gb/s effective with 64 Bytes completions. So, it can&#039;t do 40 Gb/s but it&#039;s not like marketing cares about details like that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beyond the fact that the 40 Gb/s Ethernet spec is not finished yet (scheduled for June 2010), how do you run 40 Gb/s through a PCIe Gen2 x8 slot ? That&#8217;s 32 Gb/s theoretical bandwidth, 26 Gb/s effective with 64 Bytes completions. So, it can&#8217;t do 40 Gb/s but it&#8217;s not like marketing cares about details like that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
