<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science startup reduces compute time from 26 days to 8 hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/10/09/science-startup-business-reduces-compute-time-with-hpc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/10/09/science-startup-business-reduces-compute-time-with-hpc/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchmal ist Fortschritt auch ein Rückschritt &#8211; Vergessene Lösungen &#124; Banedon's Cyber-Junk</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/10/09/science-startup-business-reduces-compute-time-with-hpc/#comment-186289</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchmal ist Fortschritt auch ein Rückschritt &#8211; Vergessene Lösungen &#124; Banedon's Cyber-Junk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=7816#comment-186289</guid>
		<description>[...] Science startup reduces compute time from 26 days to 8 hours &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Science startup reduces compute time from 26 days to 8 hours &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science startup reduces compute time from 26 days to 8 hours &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/10/09/science-startup-business-reduces-compute-time-with-hpc/#comment-186221</link>
		<dc:creator>Science startup reduces compute time from 26 days to 8 hours &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=7816#comment-186221</guid>
		<description>[...] See the original post:  Science startup reduces compute time from 26 days to 8 hours &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the original post:  Science startup reduces compute time from 26 days to 8 hours &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1610915172">Randall Hand</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2009/10/09/science-startup-business-reduces-compute-time-with-hpc/#comment-186191</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1610915172">Randall Hand</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=7816#comment-186191</guid>
		<description>Any information on why they didn&#039;t opt for something GPU-based? Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vizworld.com/2009/06/jacket-1-1-for-gpu-acclerated-matlab-now-available/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jacket&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vizworld.com/2009/05/cuda-enable-matlab-with-gpumat/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GPUMat&lt;/a&gt; ?  

I would like to know what kind of boost (if any) those offered compared to the CX1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any information on why they didn&#8217;t opt for something GPU-based? Like <a href="http://www.vizworld.com/2009/06/jacket-1-1-for-gpu-acclerated-matlab-now-available/" rel="nofollow">Jacket</a> or <a href="http://www.vizworld.com/2009/05/cuda-enable-matlab-with-gpumat/" rel="nofollow">GPUMat</a> ?  </p>
<p>I would like to know what kind of boost (if any) those offered compared to the CX1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
