<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China aims to try again with petascale super from Longsoon chips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2010/01/20/china-aims-to-try-again-with-petascale-super-from-longsoon-chips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/01/20/china-aims-to-try-again-with-petascale-super-from-longsoon-chips/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John West</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/01/20/china-aims-to-try-again-with-petascale-super-from-longsoon-chips/#comment-204276</link>
		<dc:creator>John West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=9629#comment-204276</guid>
		<description>Well, porting (as in compiles and runs correctly) is different from running efficiently. MIPS isn&#039;t even a processor family broken out by name any more in the Top500 (it disappeared after June 2004, when it had 3 systems), and the &quot;other&quot; category has 0.2% of the Top500. Hard to argue that there is a current base of effective MIPS application software in HPC. A knowledgeable person might be able to argue that because MIPS is still very popular in embedded applications that getting the software together for drivers and stuff will be less of a challenge, but that&#039;s out of my depth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, porting (as in compiles and runs correctly) is different from running efficiently. MIPS isn&#8217;t even a processor family broken out by name any more in the Top500 (it disappeared after June 2004, when it had 3 systems), and the &#8220;other&#8221; category has 0.2% of the Top500. Hard to argue that there is a current base of effective MIPS application software in HPC. A knowledgeable person might be able to argue that because MIPS is still very popular in embedded applications that getting the software together for drivers and stuff will be less of a challenge, but that&#8217;s out of my depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/01/20/china-aims-to-try-again-with-petascale-super-from-longsoon-chips/#comment-204181</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=9629#comment-204181</guid>
		<description>SiCortex was MIPS.  Debian GNU/Linux and others run fine on MIPS.  The software&#039;s already ported.  *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SiCortex was MIPS.  Debian GNU/Linux and others run fine on MIPS.  The software&#8217;s already ported.  *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
