<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFD Gaining Ground in Formula One Racing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/</link>
	<description>HPC news for supercomputing professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomba</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/comment-page-1/#comment-228587</link>
		<dc:creator>tomba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10406#comment-228587</guid>
		<description>CFD like virgin racing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFD like virgin racing <img src='http://insidehpc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Formula D Racing?</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/comment-page-1/#comment-215330</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Formula D Racing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10406#comment-215330</guid>
		<description>[...] CFD Gaining Ground in Formula One Racing (insidehpc.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CFD Gaining Ground in Formula One Racing (insidehpc.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What to read at insideHPC this week &#124; insideHPC.com</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/comment-page-1/#comment-213167</link>
		<dc:creator>What to read at insideHPC this week &#124; insideHPC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10406#comment-213167</guid>
		<description>[...] CFD gaining ground in Formula One racing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CFD gaining ground in Formula One racing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/comment-page-1/#comment-212505</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10406#comment-212505</guid>
		<description>CFD = complete f***ing disaster?  That&#039;s funny, now answer this question:

You control an F1 team.  You are given 3 options for aerodynamic optimization:
A) CFD only
B) physical testing only
C) A combination of physical testing and CFD

In a related question:  Guess which of the above choices 100% of successful F1 teams have selected for the past 5-10 years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFD = complete f***ing disaster?  That&#8217;s funny, now answer this question:</p>
<p>You control an F1 team.  You are given 3 options for aerodynamic optimization:<br />
A) CFD only<br />
B) physical testing only<br />
C) A combination of physical testing and CFD</p>
<p>In a related question:  Guess which of the above choices 100% of successful F1 teams have selected for the past 5-10 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Leidel</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/comment-page-1/#comment-212276</link>
		<dc:creator>John Leidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10406#comment-212276</guid>
		<description>Chris, indeed, 14 seconds off pace in Formula 1 is technically &quot;turtle mode.&quot;  Hopefully this will look up for the little Virgin Racing team.  &quot;The little F-1 team that could&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, indeed, 14 seconds off pace in Formula 1 is technically &#8220;turtle mode.&#8221;  Hopefully this will look up for the little Virgin Racing team.  &#8220;The little F-1 team that could&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris V</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/08/cfd-gaining-ground-in-formula-one-racing/comment-page-1/#comment-212259</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10406#comment-212259</guid>
		<description>&quot;After the first runs in Jerez this week, CFD was beginning to take on the initials of Complete ****ing Disaster.&quot; 

Hopefully they made some improvements before the race but in the following article they were saying that the CFD only car was 14 seconds off the pace.  I think you would get lapped every 5 laps at that rate.

http://www.planet-f1.com/news/3261/5946843</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After the first runs in Jerez this week, CFD was beginning to take on the initials of Complete ****ing Disaster.&#8221; </p>
<p>Hopefully they made some improvements before the race but in the following article they were saying that the CFD only car was 14 seconds off the pace.  I think you would get lapped every 5 laps at that rate.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.planet-f1.com/news/3261/5946843" rel="nofollow">http://www.planet-f1.com/news/3261/5946843</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

