<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ScaleMP Announces Java Performance Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/30/scalemp-announces-java-performance-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/30/scalemp-announces-java-performance-record/</link>
	<description>HPC news for supercomputing professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shai Fultheim</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/30/scalemp-announces-java-performance-record/comment-page-1/#comment-218189</link>
		<dc:creator>Shai Fultheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10732#comment-218189</guid>
		<description>Hey Mark,

I specifically referred to the architecture as a whole.  Clearly DSM, VMMs, fast interconnects, were there way before ScaleMP.  I just believe we combine them in new and unique way.

Shai.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mark,</p>
<p>I specifically referred to the architecture as a whole.  Clearly DSM, VMMs, fast interconnects, were there way before ScaleMP.  I just believe we combine them in new and unique way.</p>
<p>Shai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John West</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/30/scalemp-announces-java-performance-record/comment-page-1/#comment-218172</link>
		<dc:creator>John West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10732#comment-218172</guid>
		<description>I think Shai&#039;s reference to &quot;entirely new&quot; is his particular architecture, not software shared memory itself as that has clearly been around for a while. But it&#039;s best to let Shai answer for himself -- he reads the site so we&#039;ll let him respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Shai&#8217;s reference to &#8220;entirely new&#8221; is his particular architecture, not software shared memory itself as that has clearly been around for a while. But it&#8217;s best to let Shai answer for himself &#8212; he reads the site so we&#8217;ll let him respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hahn</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/03/30/scalemp-announces-java-performance-record/comment-page-1/#comment-218145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=10732#comment-218145</guid>
		<description>what the heck is &quot;entirely new&quot; about it?  come on, I understand enthusiasm, especially from marketing people, but let&#039;s be honest to history: software SHM has a long history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the heck is &#8220;entirely new&#8221; about it?  come on, I understand enthusiasm, especially from marketing people, but let&#8217;s be honest to history: software SHM has a long history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

