<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terascala tries to put a coat of paint on Oracle&#8217;s Lustre changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2010/06/04/terascala-on-oracles-lustre-strategy-and-what-customers-can-expect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/06/04/terascala-on-oracles-lustre-strategy-and-what-customers-can-expect/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lustre&#8217;s future &#171; scalability.org</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/06/04/terascala-on-oracles-lustre-strategy-and-what-customers-can-expect/#comment-231524</link>
		<dc:creator>Lustre&#8217;s future &#171; scalability.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=11949#comment-231524</guid>
		<description>[...] wrench in the works of the smaller fry like Terascala. John at InsideHPC noted the same thing, and was somewhat more blunt in his analysis. His analysis, that the letter was effectively a coat of paint, seems to be something of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrench in the works of the smaller fry like Terascala. John at InsideHPC noted the same thing, and was somewhat more blunt in his analysis. His analysis, that the letter was effectively a coat of paint, seems to be something of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
