<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patterson: Multicore is a Hail Mary pass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2010/07/19/patterson-multicore-is-a-hail-mary-pass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/07/19/patterson-multicore-is-a-hail-mary-pass/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What to read at insideHPC this week &#124; insideHPC.com</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/07/19/patterson-multicore-is-a-hail-mary-pass/#comment-241414</link>
		<dc:creator>What to read at insideHPC this week &#124; insideHPC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=12609#comment-241414</guid>
		<description>[...] Patterson: Multicore is a Hail Mary pass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patterson: Multicore is a Hail Mary pass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake T. Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/07/19/patterson-multicore-is-a-hail-mary-pass/#comment-240386</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake T. Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=12609#comment-240386</guid>
		<description>I have a few comments on this article which I have posted on my blog, &quot;Multicore in HPC – Where will we stand in 10 years?&quot;

http://wp.me/pXtX6-4y

One additional outcome in ten years, in addition to David&#039;s three scenarios, may be &quot;The semiconductor industry will find some new process and material to build faster processors.  The era of multicore will not be over, but we will see the growth of core counts stabilize as individual cores increase in speed.  By the time a new manufacturing process is in place, many of the applications in enterprise, research, and engineering communities will have already been parallelized and will continue to require multiple cores.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a few comments on this article which I have posted on my blog, &#8220;Multicore in HPC – Where will we stand in 10 years?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://wp.me/pXtX6-4y" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pXtX6-4y</a></p>
<p>One additional outcome in ten years, in addition to David&#8217;s three scenarios, may be &#8220;The semiconductor industry will find some new process and material to build faster processors.  The era of multicore will not be over, but we will see the growth of core counts stabilize as individual cores increase in speed.  By the time a new manufacturing process is in place, many of the applications in enterprise, research, and engineering communities will have already been parallelized and will continue to require multiple cores.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
