<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Processors Will Mean New AVX Instructions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2010/11/23/new-processors-will-mean-new-avx-instructions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/11/23/new-processors-will-mean-new-avx-instructions/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/11/23/new-processors-will-mean-new-avx-instructions/#comment-274980</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=15584#comment-274980</guid>
		<description>I guess this will give more freedom for code-oriented people but not for me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this will give more freedom for code-oriented people but not for me <img src='http://insidehpc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nail</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/11/23/new-processors-will-mean-new-avx-instructions/#comment-273348</link>
		<dc:creator>Nail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=15584#comment-273348</guid>
		<description>So, the developments in hardware pushes software up and vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the developments in hardware pushes software up and vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yin</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/11/23/new-processors-will-mean-new-avx-instructions/#comment-273340</link>
		<dc:creator>Yin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=15584#comment-273340</guid>
		<description>Absoft Pro Fortran Compiler Suite will release the new version with AVX optimizations after the new processors are available in the market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absoft Pro Fortran Compiler Suite will release the new version with AVX optimizations after the new processors are available in the market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Riedy</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/11/23/new-processors-will-mean-new-avx-instructions/#comment-273071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Riedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=15584#comment-273071</guid>
		<description>gcc has supported AVX for quite a while...  It&#039;s in the 4.4 series and later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gcc has supported AVX for quite a while&#8230;  It&#8217;s in the 4.4 series and later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2010/11/23/new-processors-will-mean-new-avx-instructions/#comment-273055</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=15584#comment-273055</guid>
		<description>HPC users always want the cheap way out so all the commercial compilers better get to it before gcc offers AVX support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HPC users always want the cheap way out so all the commercial compilers better get to it before gcc offers AVX support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
