<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New HPC Problem: Checksums for Large Archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2011/02/15/a-new-hpc-problem-checkbit-sums-for-large-archives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/02/15/a-new-hpc-problem-checkbit-sums-for-large-archives/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: Panel Discussion on National Archives Assembly &#124; insideHPC.com</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/02/15/a-new-hpc-problem-checkbit-sums-for-large-archives/#comment-341827</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: Panel Discussion on National Archives Assembly &#124; insideHPC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 22:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=17399#comment-341827</guid>
		<description>[...] reported here, the task of running checkpoint sums for large archives is fast-becoming a supercomputer-class [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reported here, the task of running checkpoint sums for large archives is fast-becoming a supercomputer-class [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/02/15/a-new-hpc-problem-checkbit-sums-for-large-archives/#comment-305003</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=17399#comment-305003</guid>
		<description>I would never have thought that checksums could became such a big issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would never have thought that checksums could became such a big issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention A New HPC Problem: Checksums for Large Archives &#124; insideHPC.com -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/02/15/a-new-hpc-problem-checkbit-sums-for-large-archives/#comment-304749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention A New HPC Problem: Checksums for Large Archives &#124; insideHPC.com -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=17399#comment-304749</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by insideHPC, soowoi and Larry, Rob Hunt. Rob Hunt said: RT @insideHPC: Just in: A New HPC Problem: Checksums for Large Archives http://bit.ly/i6KaHM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by insideHPC, soowoi and Larry, Rob Hunt. Rob Hunt said: RT @insideHPC: Just in: A New HPC Problem: Checksums for Large Archives <a href="http://bit.ly/i6KaHM" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/i6KaHM</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
