<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Amdahl&#8217;s Law Doesn&#8217;t Apply</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2011/06/28/21047/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/06/28/21047/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hahn</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/06/28/21047/#comment-353739</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=21047#comment-353739</guid>
		<description>I hope people don&#039;t read the article and think that it&#039;s a real criticism of Amdahl.  the example it gives (with multiple phases and varying levels of parallelism) is really a reiteration of Amdahl&#039;s asymptotic analysis.  it really is all about the serial fraction, since you can only reduce the parallel sections to zero cost...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope people don&#8217;t read the article and think that it&#8217;s a real criticism of Amdahl.  the example it gives (with multiple phases and varying levels of parallelism) is really a reiteration of Amdahl&#8217;s asymptotic analysis.  it really is all about the serial fraction, since you can only reduce the parallel sections to zero cost&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
