http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/11/ibm-patents-reveal-plans-for-100-petaflop-blue-geneq-super/ HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals | insideHPC Fri, 03 May 2013 04:44:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/11/ibm-patents-reveal-plans-for-100-petaflop-blue-geneq-super/#comment-370609 Grid Engine Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:23:14 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/?p=22985#comment-370609 IBM did not announce anything about supercomputers built with the design, so stop the FUD against IBM. IBM did not announce anything about supercomputers built with the design, so stop the FUD against IBM.

]]> http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/11/ibm-patents-reveal-plans-for-100-petaflop-blue-geneq-super/#comment-370456 anon Mon, 12 Sep 2011 01:35:00 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/?p=22985#comment-370456 This is just a patent for BG/Q - which technically is scalable up to 100pF - 5X the size of Sequoia - but that would be 5X the price - about $1B. This is just a patent for BG/Q – which technically is scalable up to 100pF – 5X the size of Sequoia – but that would be 5X the price – about $1B.

]]> http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/11/ibm-patents-reveal-plans-for-100-petaflop-blue-geneq-super/#comment-370388 Bill Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:55:32 +0000 http://insidehpc.com/?p=22985#comment-370388 Sure - until they decide to cancel the program when they find out they can't afford to build it. I think people in this community should start seriously questioning all these "claims" - like IBM building these systems - or Intel leading us to exascale. Come on folks - where is the reality check and the voice of reason? Sure – until they decide to cancel the program when they find out they can’t afford to build it. I think people in this community should start seriously questioning all these “claims” – like IBM building these systems – or Intel leading us to exascale. Come on folks – where is the reality check and the voice of reason?

]]>