<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCSA Fires Up Heterogeneous Forge Super</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/16/ncsa-fires-up-heterogeneous-forge-super/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/16/ncsa-fires-up-heterogeneous-forge-super/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nelson</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/16/ncsa-fires-up-heterogeneous-forge-super/#comment-371753</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=23129#comment-371753</guid>
		<description>Interesting!  The C6145s have dual IO hubs per node which should give better HBA-&gt;CPU performance than the 6100 with so many GPUs attached per node.  That&#039;s only true though if the NUMA related issues are sorted out (ie making sure that threads are properly matched to cores with the right IOH/GPU attached).  I hope they publish some benchmarks on this setup with things like NAMD STMV with differing numbers of GPUs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!  The C6145s have dual IO hubs per node which should give better HBA-&gt;CPU performance than the 6100 with so many GPUs attached per node.  That&#8217;s only true though if the NUMA related issues are sorted out (ie making sure that threads are properly matched to cores with the right IOH/GPU attached).  I hope they publish some benchmarks on this setup with things like NAMD STMV with differing numbers of GPUs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichB</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/16/ncsa-fires-up-heterogeneous-forge-super/#comment-371412</link>
		<dc:creator>RichB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=23129#comment-371412</guid>
		<description>According to their detailed specs, Forge is based on AMD Opteron Magny-Cours 6136 2.4 GHz dual-socket eight-core. We regret the error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to their detailed specs, Forge is based on AMD Opteron Magny-Cours 6136 2.4 GHz dual-socket eight-core. We regret the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balagopal Pillai</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/09/16/ncsa-fires-up-heterogeneous-forge-super/#comment-371391</link>
		<dc:creator>Balagopal Pillai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=23129#comment-371391</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t the Poweredge C6145 have the opteron 6100&#039;s instead of xeons? I think this is a typo in the story, it could mean Xeon 5600&#039;s on Poweredge C6100&#039;s instead. I just got a bunch of these 6100&#039;s. That&#039;s why i noticed this. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the Poweredge C6145 have the opteron 6100&#8242;s instead of xeons? I think this is a typo in the story, it could mean Xeon 5600&#8242;s on Poweredge C6100&#8242;s instead. I just got a bunch of these 6100&#8242;s. That&#8217;s why i noticed this. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
