<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hengeveld: An Industry Perspective on SC11 and Disruptive Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/02/hengeveld-an-industry-perspective-on-sc11-and-disruptive-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/02/hengeveld-an-industry-perspective-on-sc11-and-disruptive-innovation/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/02/hengeveld-an-industry-perspective-on-sc11-and-disruptive-innovation/#comment-375640</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=25616#comment-375640</guid>
		<description>While I agree GPUs are programmed differently for compute than Intel&#039;s MIC I disagree with the assertion that you must think about triangles when programming.  OpenCL and CUDA bypass the graphics pipeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree GPUs are programmed differently for compute than Intel&#8217;s MIC I disagree with the assertion that you must think about triangles when programming.  OpenCL and CUDA bypass the graphics pipeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hengeveld</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/02/hengeveld-an-industry-perspective-on-sc11-and-disruptive-innovation/#comment-375165</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hengeveld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=25616#comment-375165</guid>
		<description>Intel has adopted 20MW, 2018 1Exaflop as its internal goal.
nvidia stated its goal was 20MW, 2020... in the keynote.

Various players can set a bar at a certain level.. when companies like intel and nvidia publically sign up... it counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel has adopted 20MW, 2018 1Exaflop as its internal goal.<br />
nvidia stated its goal was 20MW, 2020&#8230; in the keynote.</p>
<p>Various players can set a bar at a certain level.. when companies like intel and nvidia publically sign up&#8230; it counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Riedy</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/02/hengeveld-an-industry-perspective-on-sc11-and-disruptive-innovation/#comment-375158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Riedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=25616#comment-375158</guid>
		<description>Um, the goal of an exaflop at 20 MW was set *for* the companies and not by the companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, the goal of an exaflop at 20 MW was set *for* the companies and not by the companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
