<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Why ARM Does Compute for Future HPC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/07/video-why-arm-does-compute-for-future-hpc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/07/video-why-arm-does-compute-for-future-hpc/</link>
	<description>HPC News Without the Noise for Supercomputing Professionals &#124; insideHPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woilfgang</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/07/video-why-arm-does-compute-for-future-hpc/#comment-375978</link>
		<dc:creator>Woilfgang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=25735#comment-375978</guid>
		<description>What a commercial... Sumit doesn&#039;t seem to having heard about iPSC, Paragon, ASCI, etc. Fair to say that it&#039;s the wide spectrum of capabilities and standards of x86 which made HPC mainstream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a commercial&#8230; Sumit doesn&#8217;t seem to having heard about iPSC, Paragon, ASCI, etc. Fair to say that it&#8217;s the wide spectrum of capabilities and standards of x86 which made HPC mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernd Lauert</title>
		<link>http://insidehpc.com/2011/12/07/video-why-arm-does-compute-for-future-hpc/#comment-375238</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernd Lauert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidehpc.com/?p=25735#comment-375238</guid>
		<description>This is just stupid. x86 processors have been optimized for a wide range of workloads over the years, from windows desktops to computationally intensive applications. The typical x86 CPU just has one &quot;coprocessor&quot;: The GPU. ARM on the other hand is a platform optimized for smartphones and embedded systems with lots of coprocessors, offloading as most as possible. The standard ARM CPU does not even come with a full integer ALU and has to emulate simple divisions. Apart from all the other problems, like no 64 bit support and an MMU which cannot handle more than 4 GB of RAM for a single operating system instance.

We have yet to see an ARM compute node which actually performs. Up to that point, this seems more like a desperate stunt from NVIDIA. And the combination ARM/CUDA is certainly not making software development easier for anybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just stupid. x86 processors have been optimized for a wide range of workloads over the years, from windows desktops to computationally intensive applications. The typical x86 CPU just has one &#8220;coprocessor&#8221;: The GPU. ARM on the other hand is a platform optimized for smartphones and embedded systems with lots of coprocessors, offloading as most as possible. The standard ARM CPU does not even come with a full integer ALU and has to emulate simple divisions. Apart from all the other problems, like no 64 bit support and an MMU which cannot handle more than 4 GB of RAM for a single operating system instance.</p>
<p>We have yet to see an ARM compute node which actually performs. Up to that point, this seems more like a desperate stunt from NVIDIA. And the combination ARM/CUDA is certainly not making software development easier for anybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
